Salisbury
Diocesan Report on General Synod - February 2006
Outline
The General Synod met in London from Monday 6th to Thursday 9th
February. Before the Synod itself met, there were meetings of
the Convocations of Canterbury and York and of the House of Laity.
The major topic of the week was a discussion over the ordination
of women as bishops in the Church of England, which was split
into three different parts of the agenda. We have yet to reach
the stage of a final vote on this issue, but there is a strong
feeling on all sides that we are moving towards women bishops
in our church. The debate now centres on how this can be achieved
in a way that keeps the church together and makes provision for
those who cannot accept women as bishops. There being no legislative
business, we were able to spend more time on “desirable” business,
including several private members or diocesan synod motions.
On the second day The Archbishop of Canterbury preached a sermon,
the text of which can be found at http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/pr19b.html
Pensions
The secretary of the pensions board, Shaun Farrell, gave an excellent briefing
about what’s going on the pensions world. He put the situation facing
pension providers generally and the Church of England pension fund in particular
in a historical and contemporary financial and sociological context. He then
added the overlay of the recent Turner report and drew some conclusions about
the implications for contributions to the churches pension scheme. There
is to be a special meeting of the inter-diocesan finance forum to discuss
this on 27 March. In the meantime, listen to the presentation at www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gspmeve0602.html
Ethical
Investment. GS 1604
A report by the Ethical Investment Group, which advises the Church Commissioners,
the CBF Church of England funds and the Clergy Pensions Board, (with combined
assets of over £5 billion.) The group aims to promote a high standard of
corporate behaviour while balancing the best possible returns with good ethical
investment criteria, avoiding investments which would be inimical to church purposes
and companies with questionable management practices. Not content with simply
a passive role in avoiding certain investments the group engages in discussions
with companies and seeks out companies, which conform to their standards. Most
welcome this dialogue. An amendment, narrowly approved, criticised the American
Caterpillar Company, a manufacturer of heavy earth-moving equipment, which has
been used in Israel to demolish Palestinian homes. Some thought this unfair -
to what extent should a company be responsible for the misuse of its products?
The Group’s advice is available to any church body. See www.cofe.anglican.org/info/ethical.
See also the Archbishop of Canterbury’s letter to the Chief Rabbi http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/pr2006.html
Seeds
in Holy Ground: GS 1606
This was an important debate on the needs of rural communities and the place
of the Church in those communities. Most rural communities have a church building
and often the life of the Church is the glue that holds those communities together.
One speaker said that the Church contributes to the fabric of local communities
in real terms, which other agencies can only dream about. The crisis of farming
was the subject of some contributors, as well as the limitation of choice suffered
by many who live in rural areas. The Government seems indifferent to the problems
caused by the monopoly of the four large supermarkets. At the same time, Government
interference can be overwhelming; the regulations covering duck eggs, for example,
running to some 29,000 words. The problems caused by second-homes were highlighted,
as was the fact that the National Rural Officer is seriously under funded.
Pushing
at the Boundaries of Unity: GS Misc 801
This is an imaginative and positive report, which opens discussion, with searching
questions, about current and proposed Anglican-Baptist relations. The Baptist
Churches involved in this dialogue are linked to the Baptist Union. The report
has good theological and historical content and encourages the churches to work
together for mission. Certain joint Anglican/Baptist enterprises were celebrated,
eg. the work of The Leprosy Mission, local Churches’ Together groups and
Local Ecumenical Projects and there were many examples of good practice. It was
very evident in the debate that many Anglicans have Baptist links. Issues relating
to baptism were highlighted as an area for continued discussion. A Study Guide
is to be produced. The Bishop of Peterborough moved the
motion ‘That this
Synod commend the report for study throughout the Church of England and for local
discussion with Baptists; and request that comments be sent to the Council for
Christian Unity by 30 November 2007.’ The Synod carried the motion.
Mutual
Expectations: GS 1601
Did you know that the Church of England has 11 Colleges of Higher Education/Universities
serving approximately 115 -120,000 students, many of them adults on vocational
courses. Many of these were founded in the 19th century as teacher training colleges
but they have expanded from that base and now offer a range of distinctive courses.
A report by the Board of Education acknowledges the pressures of market forces
and government policy while encouraging the colleges to develop their identities
as institutions, which are recognizably Christian. Hear the debate at http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gspm0702.html
Admission
of Children to Communion: Item 500 and GS 1596Y
For a number of years Bishops in many dioceses (including ours) have been admitting
baptised Children to Holy Communion. Synod needed to regularise this practice
and pass legislation authorising this whilst still acknowledging that the normative
position remains Baptism, Confirmation, and Communion. At the November 2005 Group
of Sessions members gave their overwhelming support with a few minor alterations
being recommended. In this February Session Approval was given in both Houses
before Synod spent some time rehearsing arguments which had been heard before
and then voting overwhelmingly in favour of approving the regulations. http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gspm0702.html
Readers
A private member’s motion was presented, calling attention to the fact
that our 10,000 Readers are under-used, and asking the Archbishop’s Council
to consider the implications of this. A decline in numbers is however more than
matched by an increase in NSM and OLM clergy and those involved in other forms
of lay ministry. A greater emphasis on eucharistic services requiring a priest
has had a bearing on the matter, and while there is clearly some confusion between
the various categories of unpaid ministry, it was strongly felt that Readers
have a valuable role and many varying gifts. Dioceses should be encouraged to
emphasise their availability.
Slavery
A motion was brought by Southwark Diocesan Synod to commemorate the 200th anniversary
of the Parliamentary Act to abolish the slave trade. Both the shameful involvement
of the C of E in slavery and its gallant work in abolishing it were highlighted.
An apology was offered to those who are the heirs of those who were enslaved
and all were urged as a matter of priority to do their part in ridding the
world of the continuing scourge of slavery and human trafficking.
Into
the new Quinquennium: GS 1607
Your reporter admits to have been baffled by this where this debate, which was
full of references to structural relationships, the tone of conversations, process
and relationships. Perhaps the problem was that the debate came towards the end
of a long day when I was focusing on the following debate. Anyway, you can find
out for yourselves by listening to the debate at www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gspm0807.html
The
Human Genome
A fascinating debate took place on the Human Genome. A motion sent to General
Synod from the Guildford Diocesan Synod brought about the debate. We were told
that we live in the middle of a race for power over the commercialisation of
the human genome. The tension here is between the needs of humanity and the need
for expensive technology to return a profit. Some of the discussion covered the
question of whether or not we should be able to patent human genes. It was also
said that this technology makes the rich richer (literally) from the blood of
the poor. These issues are highly complex and it was agreed to ask for a report
to be prepared and brought back to Synod next year.
Hospital
and Health Care Chaplaincy: GS 1609
The Bishop of St Albans moved a motion to affirm and support chaplaincy and spiritual
healthcare as a part of wholeness and healing, to support and encourage all who
work in this area of the NHS, and to request the Government and NHS Trusts that
this should continue. The Bishop described the many pressures that the NHS is
under, financial, managerial, and technological and how this all impacts upon
the world of chaplaincy as it seeks to proclaim eternal truths whilst taking
note of changing circumstances. This was the first time that hospital chaplaincy
work has been debated by Synod, and there were many moving stories of the valuable
work being done by ordained and lay chaplains and the variety of contexts in
which they work, hospices as well as hospital Trusts, their contributions to
ethical debates and their role as critical friends in management meetings. Mention
was also made of the marginalisation of Chaplains by some Clergy and Chapters
who saw them as not doing ‘proper’ work – although this has
improved greatly recently. The motion was overwhelming carried and this important
ministry affirmed. http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gspm0802.html
Church
Buildings. GS 1610
A report presented by the Bishop of London reviewing the value of church buildings
not only as symbols of mission but also in providing for tourism, education,
community cohesion and cultural activities, and calling on the government to
be more generous with help for repairs. Of our 16,226 churches and 42 cathedrals
three-quarters are listed buildings. Major repairs in 2003 cost £112 million,
helped by grants of only £26 million. There is a backlog of repairs needed
of £373 million. The average cost of complying with disability requirements
was £49,000 per church. Heritage Lottery funds now being diverted to Olympic
preparations will reduce grants further. Discussion emphasised the need to develop
and extend the use of buildings as the best way to preserve them and called on
the government to increase financial support and to continue the current VAT
relief scheme for repairs to listed churches after March 2008 unless it has by
then been permanently favourably resolved by Europe. Further information: rebecca.payne@c-of-e.org.ukhttp://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gspm0902.html
Women
Bishops: GS 1605
There were three separate debates or presentations on Women Bishops. The first
was a presentation with questions dealing with ecumenical responses to the Guildford
Report from the Methodists, the United Reform Church and the Roman Catholic Church.
Professor Frances Young for the Methodists spoke of the ‘non-negotiable
principle of equal opportunity’ whilst recognising the threefold order
of ministry. Defining a bishop was a real question. But should not the same logic
that permitted women to be ordained priest also apply to them being ordained
bishop? Revd Anthony Milner also touched on this by saying that Roman Catholics
find it difficult to see who should be in the role of bishop unless it was commonly
understood ‘what a bishop was or did’. Without resolving these sort
of questions through dialogue, communion could be impaired on an ecumenical basis.
The URC position was put by Revd Dr David Thompson, a former moderator of their
Assembly. For him ordination of women to the priesthood was irreversible and
the role of bishops was seen ‘as an embodiment of unity’. Thus alternative
Episcopal arrangements were not ecumenically viable, nor pastorally sustainable.
The
second debate was to “take note” of the report, which
gave people the chance to debate the content of the report. The
three main proposals were:
- A "Single
Clause" Measure - a simple provision that women could now
be bishops.
- A "Third
Province" -
in effect creating a separate Church of England with its own
ministry, structures and governance.
- Some kind
of "Transferred
Episcopal Arrangements" (TEA) which would hold the Church
of England together but create sacramental and pastoral provision
under a male Provincial Regional Bishop (PRB) for those parishes
which could not accept women bishops.
The third bite
at this particular cherry, this time with a very specific and
lengthy motion moved by the Archbishop of Canterbury, came on
the final morning. The motion welcomed the review of options
in the report, asked for further explorations along the lines
of “Transferred Episcopal Arrangements” (TEA), sought
further work on the theological, ecumenical and canonical implications
of this approach, asked for a debate at the July Synod to determine
the next steps, and invited everyone to reflect prayerfully on
the serious decisions facing the Church. Three and a quarter
hours was allowed for this debate and many angles were presented.
In his opening speech the Archbishop emphasised the importance
of managing diversity, of continuing theological exploration,
and warned against looking for the neat and tidy way ahead that
would fail to hold people together. He said that we were in unchartered
territory, and as we sought to manage diversity and conflict
we could well find out important things about ourselves and model
something for the whole church.
As one would
expect there were speeches from all the main standpoints though
clearly the Third Province option was a non-starter since no
one spoke about this nor was an amendment moved in that direction.
Many of the imponderables about TEA were raised, not least by
Chancellor Collingsby who listed a myriad of legal minefields.
The Bishop of Willesden emphasised that this wasn’t the
finished article and that we were looking at a pragmatic evangelical
solution to a Catholic problem (!).Many spoke of TEA being the
only answer for a muddled world. Our own Robert Key made his
maiden speech proposing an amendment that removed TEA and asked
for a ‘simple enabling Measure with an enforceable code
of practice” to be considered. This amendment had the backing
of WATCH and Affirming Catholic members – and his speech
received prolonged acclaim, but was lost on a show of hands.
Another amendment that asked for a “Single Clause Measure” to
be looked at alongside TEA was lost on a vote by Houses. To some
this was surprising given the talk in the corridors about the
unsatisfactory nature of TEA, but clearly the Archbishop’s
earnest appeals to Synod to finding ways ahead that are inclusive
and not adversarial, that simple solutions will only drive us
apart, were ones that won the hearts of the vast majority of
Synod. After a very long but well-mannered and generous debate
the motion was passed with 348 in favour and one against (abstentions
are not counted – and there may well have been several).
The July Synod awaits what comes from the continued theological
reflection and possible ways ahead. The devil will be in the
detail and if women are to be bishops on an equal footing with
their male counterparts then there is some very hard work still
to be done.
http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/pr19a.html We suggest that you
read the arguments, including the theological and structural basis
for TEA in the Guildford Report, which can be found at http://www.cofe.anglican.org/about/gensynod/agendas/gs1605.rtf
Questions
79 written questions were submitted by members of Synod. The responses will be
available online in the near future. Questions relating to the Octavia Hill
Estates were taken on Wednesday morning. The questions were far ranging and
included - the availability of theology degree courses to part-time ordinands;
statistics re Curacies and curates; support and guidance for ordinands; the
inclusion of deaf people in ministry; numbers and gender of non-stipendiary
priests by Diocese, cuts to primary healthcare trusts; study of doctor-aided
deaths; initiatives to counter ignorance of Christianity; representations
in support of Mordecai Vanunu; civil funerals; civil partnerships; homosexual
practice: public expression of views; threat to freedom of religious speech;
Racial Hatred Bill and comment on proposed legislation, sale of clergy retirement
housing; Shell: ECCR Resolution; Legal Office out-sourcing;: financial assistance
for opponents of women Bishops, pension issues, criteria for delegation of
dioceses as ‘rural’, policies of delaying appointment to parishes;
Fresh Expressions: report; Mission-Shaped Church; 2008 Lambeth Conference
cost and numbers; Senior appointments: supporter and opponents of ordination
of women; Jerry Springer – the Opera; Thirst for Life campaign; and
denial of Virgin birth: disciplinary implications. All the questions and
answers can be found at: http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/gspm0702.html
Some
Synod quotes:
‘Nothing is more destructive of true understanding than spurious simplicity’.
The Bishop of Guildford (quoting Lord Hope) in introducing the women bishops
debate.
‘You
may as well fall flat on your face as lean over too far backwards’.
Also the Bishop of Guildford.
‘We share
99.8% of our genes with each other, 98% with chimpanzees and
50% with prunes.’ Canon
John Ashe introducing the debate on human genomes.
A
question to close: The Revd Paul Perkin (Southwark)
to ask the Chairman of the Cathedrals and Church Buildings
Division: "In the light
of:
(a) recent guidance from the Ecclesiastical Insurance Group
that the 2005 Working at Height Regulations apply to church buildings;
and
(b) media reports late last year that four people and scaffolding
were needed to change five light bulbs 40 feet above ground at
St Benet’s Roman Catholic
Church in Beccles at a cost of £1,300, has the Division made
any assessment of:
i) how many Anglicans it would take to change
all the light bulbs in similarly lofty locations within Church
of England buildings; and
ii) what the total cost of such work
would be for Parochial Church Councils across the country!!”
The
next group of sessions will be held at the University of York from
Friday 7th to Tuesday 11th July |