search
 

28th June 2004 Click to go back to the previous page

 

WILTSHIRE CONSTABULARY

 

Robert Key Esq MP
House of Commons
LONDON
SW1A 0AA

Dear Robert,

A303/A344 Stonehcnge Fork

Further to your letter dated 8 June 2004 concerning a fatal road traffic collision on the A303 at the Stonehenge Fork on Saturday 29 May 2004. This incident is still under investigation by officers from the Traffic Department here at Salisbury.

The circumstances of the collision suggest that the driver of the vehicle appears to have made an illegal left turn from the junction. This driver was very seriously injured and has not yet been able to speak. Speed has not been a factor in this case and collision history at this location shows that it is frequently illegal driving manoeuvres that arc the cause.

Following this incident Inspector Williams, of the divisional Traffic Department, discussed this junction with a representative from the Highways Agency. A full traffic management report is in the process of being prepared and a meeting will be held between the Divisional Traffic Department, Wiltshire County Council and the Highways Agency to discuss the findings.

I do not consider that 30 mph is appropriate for this section of road and further it does not meet the criteria for such a speed limit and would be likely to cause frustration and confusion to motorists.

For your information I have outlined below the procedure and some of the findings to be considered.

Criteria for setting of speed limits:

  1. All requests for a speed limit on the A303 at Stonehcnge Fork would need to be considered by the Highways Agency and their managing agents, namely W S Atkins.
  2. The most important factor when setting a speed limit is how the road appears to the road user. This is influenced by the geometry of the road (road width, sightlines. bends, crossings etc) and the environment through which the road travels (rural, residential, shop frontages, schools etc). Road users should, and will, expect lower
    speed limits where they can see there are potentially more risks.
  3. To simply make a legal order and erect speed limit signs does not automatically ensure that there is a reduction in speed or the potential for collisions as a consequence.
  4. To influence driver behaviour and produce a road safety benefit requires more than the fear of prosecution.
  5. An additional factor that must be considered is a realisation by the majority of reasonable road users that the speed limit has been imposed at a site which genuinely requires special protection and has been fixed at a level which is not unrealistically low.
  6. If the A303 was managed by Wiltshire County Council, and not a trunk road, then a 30mph speed limit would not be considered due to there being no urbanized development on both sides of the road together with noticeable pedestrian activity.
  7. Speed limits are monitored by use of the 85%ile rule. This is the speed that is achieved by 85% of the traffic using the road by way of the signed speed limit.
  8. Wiltshire Constabulary fully supports all road safety measures and works closely with the Highways Agency.

I hope the above answers your questions but should you require any further information then please do not hesitate to contact me.

Chief Superintendant Jeremy Wickham, BSc, MBA, Divisional Commander 'A'

 

Click to go back to the previous page

 

 

 

Look further with these related links
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jump to the top of this page


[ home | how may I help you? | Robert's views | election site | the salisbury constituency ]
[ Robert's biography | science |dfid | defence | speech archives | photo gallery | web links | site map ]
All material on this site is copyright to Robert Key unless otherwise stated
©2001
Site designed, developed and maintained by Cravenplan Computers Limited