| |
Munitions
Depots
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the anticipated remediation
costs will be, including munitions and chemical retrieval, prior
to the market sale of Dean Hill munitions depot; and when he expects
to put it on the market. [65734] |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
Defence Munition (DM) Dean Hill's primary task is (and has been)
the storage of munitions. The limited (compared to other Defence
Munitions sites) processing facilities at the Dean Hill site have
primarily been used for maintenance of munitions and associated
stores. There has been no explosives manufacturing on site and hence
little anticipated contamination to remediate. This has been confirmed
by Land Quality Assessment action and a sum of £216,000 has
been included in the Investment Appraisal to cover any "industrial
site" remediation identified as necessary during run down and
closure activities.
It is anticipated that Defence Estates will market the sale of the
Dean Hill site in 2004-05 once all closure activities have been
completed.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many Ministry of Defence
police are employed at West Dean Munitions Depot; and how they will
be deployed following the closure of the depot. [65706]
|
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
There are currently 21 MDP officers stationed at Defence Munitions
(DM) Dean Hill. DM Dean Hill is scheduled for closure by 1 April
2004 and the MDP officers stationed there will be subject to redeployment
procedures. We do not envisage any compulsory redundancies of MDP
officers.
3 Jul 2002 : Column: 325W
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many of the employees
at the West Dean Munitions Depot are (a) under 25, (b)
under 45, (c) under 60 and (d) over 60 in each category,
broken down by sex. [65707] |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
The age profile and gender of the bearing of 57 Defence Munitions
civilian staff currently employed at DM Dean Hill near West Dean
village in south Wiltshire is as follows:
| Age |
Male |
Female |
Total |
| Under
25 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
| 26
to 45 |
(2)19 |
4 |
23 |
| 46
to 60 |
18 |
6 |
24 |
| Over
60 |
5 |
- |
5 |
| |
|
|
|
| Total |
46 |
11 |
57 |
(2)
Includes two members of civilian staff on long term detached duty
due to return to DM Dean Hill.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the area is of the
munitions depot at West Dean, Wiltshire; and what percentage is
(a) buildings, (b) roads and hard standing, (c)
farmland, (d) woodland and (e) designated as a SSSI.
[65714] |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
The Defence Munitions Depot, Dean Hill has a total area of some
236 hectares (583 acres). Building development is of low density
and disbursed across the whole site. There are 1.3 hectares of underground
storage within the hillside and approximately five hectares of buildings.
These are connected by an infrastructure of roads, rail, services
and bonded storage which is contained within a footprint of approximately
75 hectares or 31 per cent. of the total. 36 per cent. of the site
is let for agricultural purposes, while woodland constitutes 15
per cent. The site of special scientific interest (SSSI) extends
to some 43 hectares or 18 per cent. of the total, and it should
be noted that part of the woodland is within the SSSI.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of (a)
stored munitions and (b) engineering and munitions maintenance
work is carried out at Dean Hill for each of the three armed services.
[65732] |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
48 per cent. by volume of the munitions stored at Dean Hill are
held in support of the Navy and 52 per cent. in support of the RAF.
However, munitions stocks held at Dean Hill represent less than
four per cent. of munitions stored by Defence Munitions on behalf
of all three armed services.
In the last
year, 49 per cent. of engineering and munitions maintenance work
at Dean Hill was carried out in support of the Navy and 51 per
cent. in support of the RAF. Again, however, this represents about
four per cent. of the processing capacity within Defence Munitions.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will list the criteria
used to decide which munitions depot to dispose of; and if he will
list the depots against which Dean Hill competed. [65733] |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
An internal rationalisation study, known as Defence Munitions Rationalisation
Study 2 (DMRS 2), started in 2001, and examined the best utilisation
of Defence Munitions (DM) facilities throughout the United Kingdom.
An earlier study (DMRS 1) had already recommended two other site
closures at DM Welford on Berkshire and DM Smalmstown near Carlisle
in 2000.
Even after
the impact of the closure of the Welford and Smalmstown sites
has been taken into account, DMRS 2 confirmed that spare capacity
remains in DM's explosives storage and processing capacity.
The DMRS 2
team examined munitions storage, processing and supply issues.
Most of DM's eight principal depots cover a variety of these outputs.
The study drew these elements together to determine how the necessary
capacity could most efficiently be retained. Taking all of these
elements into account, it was concluded that only the capacity
and facilities provided by the DM Depot at Dean Hill, near to
West Dean village in south Wiltshire, was not critical to the
delivery of DM's outputs. The other Defence Munitions depots are
required either for the volume of explosives storage and processing
capacity they offer and/or have specialised (often unique) facilities
to outload and issue munitions to customers.
All eight Defence Munitions depots were included in the review.
Apart from DM Dean Hill, these are DM Beith in Ayrshire, DM Crombie
in Fife, DM Glen Douglas in Dunbartonshire, DM Gosport in Hampshire,
DM Kineton in Warwickshire, DM Longtown in Cumbria and DM Plymouth
in Devon.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence in respect of the closure
of the munitions depot at Dean Hill, Wiltshire, what will be (a)
the expected annual savings to his Department, (b) the anticipated
revenue from the sale of married quarters to (i) sitting
tenants and (ii) the market, (c) the estimated cost
of connection of the married quarters estate to civilian services
for (A) electricity, (B) water and (C) gas,
(d) the ongoing annual maintenance of the site broken down
into (1) buildings, (2) ground maintenance and (3)
security and (e) the estimated market value of the site at
sale. [65705] |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
The annual savings from the closure of the Dean Hill site are estimated
to be £2.083 million once all one-off expenditure is taken
into account.
We currently
estimate the cost of separating as, electricity-£50,000;
water-£40,000; sewerage-£90,000. Gas is already supplied
from a separate Calor gas tank. All figures exclude VAT. The annual
maintenance budget can be broken down as follows: buildings-£894,000;
grounds maintenance-£25,000. So far as security is concerned
the approximate cost of the Ministry of Defence police presence
at DM Dean Hill was £800,000 for financial year 2001-02.
Although the
Ministry of Defence has assessed the disposal value of the West
Dean site and associated residential properties, these are likely
to be sold on the open market. To release our estimates of value
could influence the eventual receipt, and I am, therefore, withholding
this information under Exemption 7 of the Code of Practice on
Access to Government Information.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
what arrangements are in place for (a) staff consultation,
(b) assistance to staff from the employment service and (c)
consultation with the local planning authority in respect of the
closure of West Dean munitions depot. |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
Defence Munitions (DM) entered into formal consultation procedures
with the national trade unions on 24 June. Consultation is due
to complete on 2 August. Each member of staff at the depot has
been given a copy of a consultative document. As part of the Staff
consultation process the local trade unions have been invited
to an open day on 10 July, to be briefed on the background, conduct
and findings of the work which led to the recommendation to close
the DM site at Dean Hill.
Although their
involvement in no way precluded the formal consultation process,
TU representatives also provided valuable advice throughout the
process. The Ministry of Defence outplacement scheme will be involved
should the depot close as proposed, and would help staff find
alternative opportunities. This would include help in CV preparation,
coaching in interviewing techniques, and retraining skills if
appropriate. The local planning authority (Test Valley) are aware
of plans to close DM Dean Hill. They, Defence Estates and Defence
Munitions have already met to discuss the potential impact of
depot closure and options for developing the site.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
when the consultation period will end on his proposal to close Dean
Hill Munitions Depot; and if he will list the consultees. |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
The formal consultation period began with the issue of a Consultative
Document on 24 June 2002 and was originally due to complete on
2 August. However, following recent representations from the trade
unions the consultation period has been extended by two weeks
and will now conclude on 16 August 2002. Formal consultation with
the trade unions is being carried out at departmental level, i.e.
with the MOD Council of Civil Service Unions (MOD CCSU) and the
MOD Industrial Whitley Council (MOD DIWC). For completeness the
Defence Police Federation and the Chief Police Officers' Association
are also involved in this consultation exercise.
The formal
consultation process is being supplemented by informal contact
with the trade unions and staff within Defence Munitions. Officials
of the DM Whitley committees have received personal copies of
the consultation document, as has every member of staff in the
Dean Hill depot. A copy has also been posted on an internal MOD
website. The formal study report has also been sent to key members
of the national trade unions and is available to DM staff and
other TU representatives upon request. A DM trade union open day
has been arranged for 10 July at which DM trade union representatives
will hear about the background to the proposal to close the depot.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
what are the (a) estimated sale proceeds, (b) estimated
redundancy lump-sum payments, (c) Ministry of Defence police
transfer costs, (d) staff transfer costs, (e) costs
of movement of stock, (f) cost of replacement facilities,
(g) operating costs transferred to other locations and (h)
T and H storage reprovision relating to the closure of Dean Hill
Munitions Depot |
|
| A. |
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
what modifications were made to the terms of reference for Defence
Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 after 11th September 2001. |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
There were no modifications made to the Terms of Reference for
the Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study after 11 September
2001.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
when the team responsible for Defence Munitions Rationalisation
Study 2 presented their final report. |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
The Defence Munitions Rationalisations Study 2 presented their
final report to the Defence Munitions Management Board in February
2002. There then followed an internal Departmental approvals procedure
which culminated in a submission to Minister (Armed Forces) in
June 2002 .
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
if the Director of Military Operations participated in Defence Munitions
Rationalisation Study 2. |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
Director of Military Operations did not participate in the Defence
Munitions Rationalisation Study 2. The study drew its knowledge
of anticipated Tri Service munitions requirements from both the
current and future munitions equipment owners who were asked to
take into account the latest output from the Ministry of Defence's
Stockpile Planning Group.
Other MOD
customers and internal stakeholders (particularly Strike Command
given the nature of the RAF tasks currently undertaken at Defence
Munitions Dean Hill) have been made aware of the proposal to close
DM Dean Hill.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
whether Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 included a strategic
analysis. |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 was in itself a strategic
analysis of the Defence Munitions business. Amongst those elements
addressed were:-
Capacity versus
long-term liability
Risk to outputs
Uniqueness of facilities
Transferability of tasks
Proximity of customers
Health and safety and explosive safety regulations
Scale and quality of facilities
Cost of transferring tasks
Remediation
Potential savings to operating costs
Potential site realisable value
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
what the estimated monthly maintenance costs to Defence Estates
are from October 2003 in respect of Dean Hill Munitions Depot. |
|
| A. |
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
if private sector commercial advice was sought by (a) Defence
Estates Organisation and (b) the Defence Munitions Rationalisation
Study 2 team in their assessment of the likely sale value of Dean
Hill Munitions Depot. |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
In June 2001 Defence Estates South West were requested to provide
an outline desktop valuation of the Dean Hill Munitions site to
inform the Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 Investment
Appraisal. Given the nature of the valuation requested no external
advice was sought.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
what assessment he has made of whether the recommendations of Defence
Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 will achieve a 20 per cent. reduction
in operating costs by March 2004. |
|
| A. |
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
what a) factors and b) criteria were used by Defence Estates Organisation
in their tabletop evaluation of the likely sale value of Dean Hill
Munitions Depot |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
In June 2001 Defence Estates South West were requested to provide
an outline desktop valuation of the Dean Hill Munitions site to
advise the Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 Investment
Appraisal.
The valuation
was based on the estimated realisation price, assuming that the
sites had been subject to Phase 2 Land Quality Assessment. It
had been proposed that the eventual value for the site would be
abated by the cost of the remedial work once known. Site inspections
were permitted. However, in view of the sensitivity of the issues
and as the purpose was to inform an investment appraisal, no approach
was made to the local [planning authority at the that stage.
Due to the
absence of clear planning guidance, with the exception of the
residential property and agricultural land, the possible future
uses of the remainder of the site were limited. The value was
established by assuming disposal of the residential and agricultural
property, and based on the limited redevelopment and re-use of
the remaining area for potential employment uses.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
what assessment he has made of whether the recommendations of Defence
Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 will achieve a 20 per cent. reduction
in operating costs by March 2004. |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
Defence Munitions is part of the DG Defence Supply Chain (DG Def
SC) that, in turn, is part of the Defence Logistics Organisation.
Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 identified a number
of potential efficiency initiatives pertinent to the Defence Munitions
environment, including the proposal to close Defence Munitions
Dean Hill. Taken together as a package these initiatives will,
if implemented contribute towards the DG of Def SC Strategic Plan
which is designed to deliver a 20% reduction in operating costs
by Financial Year 2005-2006.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Robert
Key (Salisbury): Before the Minister makes an irrevocable decision
to sell off the houses owned by the Ministry of Defence at Dean
Hill munitions depot, will he bear it in mind that by doing so he
is destroying the heart of a rural community? Will he also have
a word with Lockheed Martin, which said of the team that services
our Paveway bombs at that establishment and is to be disbanded,
that the work force at West Dean are quite simply the best. |
|
| A. |
Dr. Moonie:
The decision to change the use of that establishment is not a
matter for me, but the sale of the houses is. If houses are surplus
to requirements, we have a duty to ensure that we receive the
best financial deal when we sell them. However, we always take
account of social need. Where possible, the houses are transferred
to an appropriate agency outwith the Ministry of Defence.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
how many copies of Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study 2 Consultative
Document (D/DM/72/46/1) dated 24th June were printed; and if he
will list the locations to which they were distributed. |
|
| A. |
Mr Ingram:
131 hard copies of the Defence Munitions Rationalisation Study 2
Consultative Document were printed. These were distributed to:-
46 to National
Trade Union officials at various locations nationwide,
57 to civilian employees at Defence Munitions (DM) Dean Hill
21 to the Ministry of Defence Police Officers stationed at DN
Dean Hill
One copy each to the DM Whitely Vice Chair and Vice Secretaries
at DM
Longtown (Cumbria), DN Beith (Ayrshire) DM Kineton (Warwickshire)
and London.
Three copies for internal MOD distribution (one Bath, one Andover,
One Wetherfield (Essex))
In the interests
of openness, efficiency and better use of resources, the Consultative
Document itself has been posted on the Defence Munitions Web Site
where it can be viewed by MOD staff as required. It was also sent
electronically to each Defence Munitions establishment at Beith,
Crombie, Glen Douglas, Gosport, Kineton, Longtown and Plymouth.
Each DM Depot reproduced sufficient hard copies from this for
their local needs as appropriate. Main MOD customers and stakeholders
were advised of the existence of the Consultative Document on
the DM Web Site.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr Robert
Key (Salisbury): To ask the Secretary of State for Defence,
on what date the closure of RAF Chilmark was announced; what was
the (a) planned date and (b) actual date of closure; what was the
(i) estimated cost and (ii) actual date of disposal; what was the
(A) estimated and (B) actual sale value of the site; what was the
(1) estimated and (2) actual cost of remediation; who calculated
the estimated sale value of the site and on what basis; what the
(x) estimated and (y) actual annual running costs of the site were
between closure and disposal; and what the annual costs have been
of decontamination work since the announcement of the closure. |
|
| A. |
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Robert
Key (Salisbury): Before the Minister makes an irrevocable decision
to sell off the houses owned by the Ministry of Defence at Dean
Hill munitions depot, will he bear it in mind that by doing so he
is destroying the heart of a rural community? Will he also have
a word with Lockheed Martin, which said of the team that services
our Paveway bombs at that establishment and is to be disbanded,
that the work force at West Dean are quite simply the best? |
|
| A. |
Dr. Moonie:
The decision to change the use of that establishment is not a
matter for me, but the sale of the houses is. If houses are surplus
to requirements, we have a duty to ensure that we receive the
best financial deal when we sell them. However, we always take
account of social need. Where possible, the houses are transferred
to an appropriate agency outwith the Ministry of Defence.
|
|
| Q. |
Mr. Key:
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what are the (a) estimated
sale proceeds, (b) estimated redundancy lump-sum payments, (c) Ministry
of Defence police transfer costs, (d) staff transfer costs, (e)
costs of movement of stock, (f) cost of replacement facilities,
(g) operating costs transferred to other locations and (h) T and
H storage reprovision relating to the closure of Dean Hill Munitions
Depot. [68907] |
|
| A. |
Mr. Ingram:
Although the Ministry of Defence has assessed the disposal value
of the West Dean site this is likely to be sold on the Open Market.
To release our estimates of value could influence the eventual
receipt. This information is therefore withheld under exception
7 of the Code of Practice to Government Information.
The other information requested is as follows:
|
. |
Number
|
| Estimated
redundancy lump-sum payments |
2,097,465
|
| Ministry
of Defence police transfer costs |
440,000 |
| Staff
transfer costs |
160,000
|
| Costs
of movement of stock |
50,000
|
| Cost
of replacement facilities |
(3)570,000
|
| Operating
costs transferred to other locations |
(4)86,000
|
| T and
H storage reprovision relating to the closure of Deal Hill
munitions depot |
450,000
|
(3) including
86,000 per annum
(4) per annum
All of these aspects plus others were taken into account in the
Investment Appraisal supporting closure.
|
|
| Q. |
To ask the
Secretary of State for Defence, on what date the closure ofRAF Chilmark
was announced; what was the ( a) planned date and (b) actual date
Qf closure; what was the (i) estimated and (ii) actual date of disposal;
what was the (A) estimated and (B) actual sale value oftlle site;
what was the (1) estimated and (2) actual cost of remediation; who
calculated the estimated sale value of the site and on what basis;
what the (x) estimated and (y) actual annual running costs of the
site were between closure and disposal; and what the annual costs
have been of decontamination work since the announcement of closure.
(68927) |
|
| A. |
Dr Lewis Moonie
MP
The closure
ofRAF Chilmark was fonnally announced in September 1992, with
a planned closure date of April 1995. The site closed on 1 April
1995.
RAF Chilmark
originally comprised separate sites at Dinton and Chilmark. Sales
of the various parts were planned to follow clearance of explosive
ordnance devices and any necessary decontamination, although it
was accepted that final clearance of the entire site could take
a considerable time.
The first
major sale was completed in July 1995, with seven further sales
since. Chilmark HQ Site and land at Ladydown are the only parts
remaining unsold.
No fonnal
estimate was made of overall sale receipts, since at the time
of closure no finn estimation could be made as to the eventual
timetable for sale.
Receipts from
those parts sold since closure total approximately £1.5
million.
No fonnal
figure was prepared prior to the results of the Land Quality Assessments
and prior to the introduction of more refined investigatory equipment.
The cost over
the first five years since closure of clearing explosive ordnance
has been in the region of £I.7 million. A further £371,000
has been spent on preparation of Land Quality Assessments and
remediation. Later figures have not yet been compiled.
The values
of those parts already sold have been assessed either by consultants
to t11e Ministry of Defence or by the District Valuer. All sales
have been at not less than open market value.
The total
of the actual holding costs of the site from closure in 1995 to
31 March 2002, excluding remediation works but including the cost
of security guarding, is in the region of£1.9 million (excluding
V AT). Estimated costs are prepared on an annual basis, and have
proved to be very close to the actual costs.
The future
cost of any necessary decontamillation of the remaining parts
at Chilmark HQ Site and Ladydown cannot be assessed until clearance
of explosive ordnance is complete.
|
|
| Q |
To ask the
Secretary of State for Defence, what the estimated monthly maintenance
costs to Defence Estates are from October 2003 in respect of Dean
Hill Munitions Depot |
|
| A. |
The Rt Hon
Adam Ingram JP MP
The Depot
is expected to be passed to Defence Estates for disposal in April
2004. An assessment of the monthly maintenance costs to cover
responsibilities under the Occupiers pf Premises Act will be made
nearer to this time.
|
|